Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 1878 of 2026
Decided on: 26.02.2026 Man Singh
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Hirdaya Ram, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In light of the prayer made in the writ petition, this petition is disposed of with the observation that let the petitioner first approach the Authority by way of a detailed representation, raising therein the issue raised in this writ petition and in the event of any representation being filed within a period of two weeks from today, let the same be decided in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of 12 weeks thereafter, in view of the averments made therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge February 26, 2026 (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?