IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Arb. Case No.09 of 2026 Decided on :08.01.2026 __________________________________________________________ M/s DCC Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus Chief Engineer (National Highway) HPPWD & others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. V.S.Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate For the respondents: Mr. S.D.Vasudeva, Dy. Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge After hearing, Mr. V.S.Chauhan, Learned Senior Counsel, a prayer is made that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the matter any further; and the proceedings may be closed. [Statement taken on record]. 2. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel. 3. Based on the prayer and the statement made by Learned Senior Counsel, the instant petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ordered to be closed with liberty to file the same before appropriate Forum-Court, hereinafter, in accordance with law, if so desired. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge January 08, 2026 [G.M]