Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5691 (RAJ)

RAVIKANT @ RAVI @ RAHUL S/O LALCHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3711/2026 · 2026-04-01

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13643] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3711/2026 Ravikant @ Ravi @ Rahul S/o Lalchand, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Anand City, Near Megha Highway, Bandikui, Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kolana (Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 546/2024 registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:13643] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3711/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner and the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ravikant @ Ravi @ Rahul S/o Lalchand, in connection with FIR No. 546/2024 registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/53