Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 569 (RAJ)

RAHUL SON OF LATE DEVIRAM @ PAPPA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17105/2025 · 2026-03-10

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10226] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17105/2025 Rahul Son Of Late Deviram @ Pappa, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Mullaka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg ( Rajasthan) ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Saurabh Pratap Singh Chauhan for Mr. Rinesh Kumar Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.149/2019 registered at Police Station Kama, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 376, 511 and 379 IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the FIR there is no allegation against the present petitioner for causing any injuries to the injured persons. The only allegation made in the FIR is that the petitioner attempted to outrage the modesty of the complainant's wife. The co-accused namely [2026:RJ-JP:10226] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17105/2025] Deviram, Ramniwas, Dan Singh and Kallu who are alleged to have inflicted the injuries have been granted benefit of bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.05.2019. Therefore, on the ground of parity with other co-accused the present petitioner may be entitled for grant of bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.12.2025 with one case as criminal antecedent. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Rahul Son Of Late Deviram @ Pappa, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/32