BORRA GUDARU ANKAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHA
WP/19244/2026 · 2026-07-15
Kiranmayee Mandava
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5686 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5686 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010351082026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 19244 OF 2026 Between:
1. BORRA GUDARU ANKAIAH, S/O. ULLAKKAYYA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RIO. BORRA VAN I PALEM, NIZAMPATNAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT-522101. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHA, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN, CHILDREN, DISABLE AND SENIOR CITIZENS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA-522101. 3. THE MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT 2007 CU, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, REPALLE REVENUE DIVISION, REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT-522101. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NIZAMPATNAM MANDAL, NIZAMPATNAM, BAPATLA DISTRICT-522314. 5. BORRA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.BORRA GUDARU ANKAIAH, AGED MAJOR, RIO. YUSUFGUDA, HYDERABAD-500045. 6. PADAMATI RAJYALAKSHMI, W/O. BABU RAO, AGED MAJOR, RIO. THATHAVARIPALEM, SUREPALLI POST-523166,
BAPATLA
2
DISTRICT
7. PILLI VENKATESWARAMMA, W/O. VEERA RAJU, AGED MAJOR, RIO. KOTHAPETA, NUZIVIDU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-521201. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Ch. Ganesh, leanred counsel appearing for Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is against the action of the 2nd respondent in not disposing the appeal filed under Section 4 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for the respondents has placed before the Court a copy of the written instructions received from the 2nd respondent dated 14.07.2026. A perusal of the same would reflect that, after filing of the appeal by the petitioner, the relevant records have been called for from the Maintenance Tribunal vide letter dated 13.07.2026. It is further stated
3
that the matter would be disposed of after issuing notice to the respective parties. 4.
Having regard to the contentions advanced, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the appeal filed by the petitioner within a stipulated period, in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 16.07.2026 BSK
4
18 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19244 OF 2026
Date: 16.07.2026 BSK