ASHARAM S/O SHRI RAMESH CHAND GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3030/2026 · 2026-03-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5685 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5685 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9673] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3030/2026 Asharam S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Banetha, P.s. Banetha, District Tonk (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail, Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.95/2025 registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 140(3), 110 and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR, but co-accused Harisingh and Lokesh were granted bail by this Court on 02.12.2025 and co-accused Mankesh and Omprakash were granted bail by this Court on 10.10.2025, respectively. He averred that none of the injuries were attributed to the present petitioner. Petitioner is behind the bars since 17.09.2025 with thirty nine
[2026:RJ-JP:9673] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3030/2026] cases reported as criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Asharam S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Gurjar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/78