Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5683 (CHH)

Manrakhan v. Jeevrakhan

SA/374/2016 · 2026-03-10

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11668 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 374 of 2016 Manrakhan S/o Late Niranjan Prasad Atholiya, Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Gatauri, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Appellant(s) versus 1 - Jeevrakhan S/o Late Niranjan Prasad Atholiya, R/o Village Gatauri, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Khuburam Died Through Lrs, Chhattisgarh 2.1 - Shivnarayan S/o Late Khuburam, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Gatauri, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2.2 - Smt. Savita Wd/o Late Sharad Kumar, Peon At Tehsil Office, Masturi, C/o Siris Shrivastava, Behind Block Colony, Masturi, Tehsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Budhram Died Through Lrs, Chhattisgarh 3.1 - Bipto Bai Wd/o Late Budhram, R/o Village Ghutku, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3.2 - Dujram, S/o Late Budhram, R/o Village Ghutku, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3.3 - Rohni Kumar S/o Late Budhram, R/o Village Ghutku, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3.4 - Roshan Kumar S/o Late Budhram, R/o Village Ghutku, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.03.12 14:40:35 +0530 2 4 - Triveni Bai W/o Jeevrakhan, R/o Village Gatauri, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Basant Kumar S/o Jeevrakhan, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Gatauri, P. O. Semartaal, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy. GA (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 11/03/2026 1. None appears for the appellant when the matter is called in the second round today. The matter was also called on the earlier dates of this week. 2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul