Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5675 (KAR)

NAKKALA LINGANNA S/O LATE N KARRENNA v. THE STATE BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL.P/101557/2023 · 2026-02-10

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1954 CRL.P No. 101557 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101557 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. NAKKALA LINGANNA S/O LATE N. KARRENNA AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. WORKING IN APSPDCL AS A PSPDCL AS A LINE INSPECTOR R/O. 20-143-7-1, NEAR PETROL BUNK, SAVARAMMA TEMPLE STREET, NEAR ST.JOSEPTH SCHOOL PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518380. 2. SMT. NAKKALA MADDAMMA W/O NAKKALA LINGANNA AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O.20-143-7-1, NEAR PETROL BUNK, SAVARAMMA TEMPLE STREET, NEAR ST.JOSEPTH SCHOOL, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518380. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA G. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALLARI WOMEN POLICE STATION AND STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BALLARI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH, AT DHARWAD-580008. 2. SMT. TRIVENI W/O RAVITHEJA AGE. 33 YEARS, 1ST CROSS, RAJYOSTAVA NAGAR, BALLARI-583101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. GANAPATI M. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.11 15:04:08 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1954 CRL.P No. 101557 of 2023 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO. 999/2022 (CRIME NO. 19/2022) ON THE FILE OF IVTH ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BALLARI FOR OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 498A, 504, 323, 506, AND 34 OF IPC AND U/SEC. 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT 1961 FOR PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 2 AND ARE CONCERNED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: "It is respectfully submits that, the petitioners and respondent No.2 have settled the matter amicably before the Hon’ble Trial Court. Therefore, kindly permit the petitioners to withdraw the above petition in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 29