Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5675 (AP)

GHANTA SATYANARAYANA v. GHANTA VEERA VENKATA SURYA NAGA LAKSHMI ALIAS KLAKSHMI

CRP/1034/2019 · 2026-07-15

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010118112019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1034/2019 Between: 1. GHANTA SATYANARAYANA, , S/O. SRI. G. BHASKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF D.NO.20/541-2, PARASPET, MACHILIPATNAM-521002. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GHANTA VEERA VENKATA SURYA NAGA LAKSHMI ALIAS KLAKSHMI, , W/o. Ghanta Satyanarayana, D/o Yadamareddy Krishna Murthy, aged about 35 years, D. No. 15/551-2-20, Srirlivasanagar Colony, Edepalli, Machilipatnam-521002, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tocivil revision petition may kindly be accepted and the impugned judgment dated 08.03.2019 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, in the IA No.852/2018 in HMOP No. 197/2016 be set aside the orders IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay of all further proceedings in I.A. No.852/2018 in H.M.O.P.No.197/2016 on the file of the Principle Senior Civil Judge, at Machilipatnam till pending disposal of the Revision. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAYARAM CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K SAI MOHAN RAO 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1034/2019 ORDER: Sri Amar Vivek Agrawal, learned counsel appeared through virtual mode, representing Sri Challa Jayarama, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the matter before the Trial Court has been decreed and the present Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted, if any, shall stand vacated. Consequently, all pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of this order. _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1034/2019 Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM