Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5673 (RAJ)

VINOD S/O ROSHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5775/2026 · 2026-04-17

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16183] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5775/2026 Vinod S/o Roshan, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Bhimgarh, Police Station Raas, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Beawar (At Present In Judicial Custody At District Jail Beawar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bismaad Kaur Ms. Harsha Dev For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.120/2026 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar for offences under Sections 331(3) and 305(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the alleged theft of ornaments from the house of the complainant. The petitioner is behind the bars since 04.04.2026 and has no prior criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping [2026:RJ-JP:16183] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5775/2026] the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Vinod S/o Roshan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/42