CRM-M-19652- IN THE H (158) HUSHANPREET STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. R MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 528 of Bh seeking quashing Additional Chief J Rajinder Singh a registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Bhawanigarh, Di whereby the bail o to the State. Non 2. It is a the petitioner in th -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH REET SINGH @ HUSAN Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Sukhcharan S. Gill, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh shing of the order dated 02.02.2026 hief Judicial Magistrate, Sangrur in c ingh and others, arising out of FI nder Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), 35 Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short h, District Sangrur alongwith all bail of the petitioner had been cance Non-bailable warrants were ordered t It is argued by learned counsel for the r in this case was not intentional but JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-19652-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA ate for the petitioner r DAG, Punjab preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) passed by the Court of Learned in criminal case titled as State Vs. of FIR No.174 dated 12.07.2025 (2), 351(3), 191(3), 190 and 238 of short “BNS”) at Police Station all the subsequent proceedings, cancelled and bonds were forfeited dered to be issued against him. for the petitioner that the absence of al but was due to noting down some M) 2026 nder SS”) rned Vs. 2025 8 of ation ings, eited ce of some AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.09 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19652- wrong date of hea Trial Court and he 3. Notic 4. Learn and has submitted It is, therefore, stre 5. This the parties. 6. The his bail was canc warrants were issu not appear to be a the Learned Addit view the fact tha Learned Trial Co petitioner to surre today. On his bonds/surety bond 7. A cop 09.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 2 of hearing. He is ready to join the pr and hence, it is urged that the petition d Notice of motion. Learned State counsel has accepted mitted that there is no illegality or inf re, stressed that the petition does not d This Court has heard the submission The petitioner had absented himself s cancelled and bonds were forfeited re issued against him for today i.e. 09 to be any illegality or infirmity in the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, ct that the petitioner is ready to joi ial Court, the petition is disposed o surrender before the Trial Court wit n his appearing before the Trial Co y bonds, he will be admitted to bail by A copy of this order be sent to the Le (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No the proceedings before the Learned tition deserves to be allowed. epted advance notice of the petition or infirmity in the impugned order. s not deserve to be allowed. ission made by learned counsel for imself on 02.02.2026, due to which feited to the State and non-bailable i.e. 09.04.2026. Though there does in the impugned order as passed by istrate, Sangrur, however, keeping in to join the proceedings before the osed of by giving direction to the urt within a period of 10 days from ial Court and furnishing fresh bail ail by the Trial Court. the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No es/No rned tition rder. l for hich lable does d by ng in e the the from bail AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.09 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.