[2026:RJ-JP:12671] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2310/2024 1. Smt. Rupa Devi Jain Wife of Shri Hansraj Jain, Aged About 72 Years, Resident of 60/162, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Shri Hansraj Jain S/o Chandanmal Jain, Aged About 78 Years, Resident of 60/162, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Varun Jain Son of Hansraj Jain, Aged About 43 Years, Resident of 60/162, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Manna Lal Choudhary Son of Shri Narayan Lal Choudhary, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of C-10, Ashok Vihar, Manyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Veerendra Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Prahalad Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/03/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.1132/2023 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this petition, parties have entered into compromise. [2026:RJ-JP:12671] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2310/2024] Counsel submits that due to compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.1132/2023 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) along with subsequent proceedings, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /180