MAGRAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIVING TH MAQSOOD AHMED v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/245/2026 · 2026-02-09
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 567 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 567 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 136
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 245/2026
Magray Construction Company Living
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankesh Chandel, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 09.02.2026
1. After arguing for a while, the only prayer made by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner in the instant petition is that he would feel satisfied in case the instant petition is treated as representation and be accorded consideration within some reasonable period in light of the documents which have been placed on record evidencing the factum that it is an admitted liability by the respondents towards the petitioner, to which, Ms. Priyanka Bhat, learned counsel appearing vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG, who has caused appearance on behalf of the respondents is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition at the very threshold.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal at the very threshold by directing respondent No. 2 to treat the instant petition as a representation and accord
consideration to the same in light of the averments pleaded in the writ petition, within a period of four weeks’ from the date a copy of this
2
WP(C) No. 245/2026
order along with the writ petition and annexures are made available to the said respondent, strictly under rules and as per law.
3. It is further made clear that while according consideration to the case of the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 shall give due weightage to the certificate dated 06.01.2026, which has been placed on record, certifying the factum of the amount by way of admitted liability payable as on date. The consideration shall be accorded strictly in terms of the order and judgment passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2472/2022 titled “M/S Saint Soldier Engineer and Contractor Pvt. Ltd. v. UT of J&K and others”.
4. The order of consideration, which is likely to be passed, be forwarded to the learned counsel for the petitioners through registered post.
5. The writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated hereinabove.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
Jammu 09.02.2026 Vishal Khajuria