Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5668 (KAR)

MALLIKARJUN TRADERS HUBLI v. TIRUPATI OIL EXTRACT PVT.LTD.,

CRL.P/102472/2022 · 2026-02-12

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2183 CRL.P No. 102472 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102472 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MALLIKARJUN TRADERS HUBLI REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MALLIKARJUN S/O BASAPPA KARADI AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. LINGARAJ NAGAR (NORTH) VIDYANAGAR HUBBALLI-580029. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TIRUPATI OIL EXTRACT PVT. LTD., COMPANY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ASHOK S/O RAMAGOPAL GOYAL AGE MAJORK, OCC. INDUSTRIALIST R/O.H.NO.32, 4TH CROSS ADARSH NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580030. 2. SMT KALPANA W/O ASHOK GOYAL AGE MAJOR OCC. DIRECTOR OF TIRUPATI OIL EXTRACT PVT.LTD., COMPANY R/O. H.NO..32, 4TH CROSS ADARSH NAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580030. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.08.2017, ORDER DATED 30.08.2017 AND ORDER DATED 19.02.2022 MADE IN CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.13 12:47:12 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2183 CRL.P No. 102472 of 2022 C.C.NO. 644/2015 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BUBBALLI AND ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUBBALLI TO RESTORE OF C.C.NO.644/2015. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: "The Advocate on behalf of the petitioner most respectfully submits as follows: The parties to the present petition have amicably resolved their disputes and in the spirit of the settlement the petitioner does not intend to further press this petition. In furtherance of the same the parties have also filed a compromise petition under O. XXIII Rule 3 of CPC in Com.O.S.No.64 of 2020 and the case has been settled in Lok adalat. It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dispose the matter as withdrawn, in the interest of justice.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2183 CRL.P No. 102472 of 2022 Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4