Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56654 (MAD)

Thirunavukarasu (died) 1) Gunasundari v. Jesica

CRP/4100/2026 · 2026-07-23

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No. 4100 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP No. 4100 of 2026 and CMP No. 17922 of 2026 1. Thirunavukarasu (died) 1) Gunasundari w/o late P.Thirunavukkarasu, No.2/1128, 49th Street, TNHB, Korattur, Chennai 600080 2. Lakshmiprathiba w/o Rajkumar No.2/1128, 49th Street, TNHB, Korattur, Chennai 600080 3. Vijayperumal S/o late P.Thirunavukkarasu No.2/1128, 49th Street, TNHB, Korattur, Chennai 600080 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Jesica w/o late Pugazhendhi No.55A, Periya Street, Tiruvannamalai Town, 2.Balamurugan s/o late Pugazhendhi No.55A, Periya Street, Tiruvannamalai Town, 3.Sundarambal w/o Subramanian, No.5, TN Nagar, 6th Cross Street, Pazhanipettai, Arakkonam Town Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4100 of 2026 PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order passed in IA no.20 of 2026 in OS No.94 of 2012 dated 02.04.2026 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai by allowing present revision. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S. Arunkumar For Respondent(s): Notice dispensed with ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 02.04.2026 passed by the Additional District Munsif Court, Thiruvannamalai, in I.A. No. 20 of 2026 in O.S. No. 94 of 2012. 2. In the aforesaid order, the application filed by the respondents / defendants 10 to 12 in the suit, seeking to reopen the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2, has been allowed, on the condition that the defendants 10 to 12 pay the cost of Rs.2,000/- to the petitioners/plaintiffs. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would now submit, on instructions, that eventhough the impugned order has been challenged by the petitioners through this Civil Revision Petition, it would suffice if a direction is issued by this Court to the trial Court to dispose of the suit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. No prejudice will be caused to any of the parties if such a direction is issued. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4100 of 2026 4. Without interfering with the impugned order, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by directing the Additional District Munsif Court, Thiruvannamalai, to dispose of O.S. No. 94 of 2012 within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 5. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is dispensed with by this Court. 23-07-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To The Additional District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 4100 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab CRP No. 4100 of 2026 and CMP No. 17922 of 2026 23-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis