Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:14241
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2778 of 2026 1 - Guru Prasad Sahu S/o Bullu Ram Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o School Para Village Pisid P.S. And Teh. Kasdol Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agriculture And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Agriculture, Indrawati Bhawan, Block 2, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Ms. Chetana Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board 25/03/2026.
1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- 10.1 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the case from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an appropriate direction to the respondent authority to consider the claim of petitioner by interchanging the post of reserve for PWD category and making it available for other category of unreserved candidates by issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
order/orders, direction/directions to grant leave BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
2 encashment and interest over it for the delay in payment. 10.3 Any other relief, including the cost of this petition, as it appears to be fit and appropriate to this Hon’ble Court.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that post reserved for persons with disability (PWD) if not filled within specified time, then it is to be filled up by general category candidate according to the Clause 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Such procedure has not been adopted by the respondents authorities, therefore, petitioner has submitted representation before the respondent No.2, which till date is pending consideration, therefore, direction be issued to concerned authorities to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner at the earliest within specified time.
3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, she is having no objection..
4. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 05.01.2026, submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of two months from the date of receipt of this order..
5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands
disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram