Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56643 (MAD)

M. Premananth v. The Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl./363/2026 · 2026-07-20

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. Crl. No.363 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. Crl. No.363 of 2026 1.M.Premananth 2.M.Arivazhagan 3.R.Raja 4.Ravi ... Petitioners Vs. 1 The Superintendent of Police Salem District. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Salem District. 3 The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Salem District. 4 C.Bagyaraj ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere in the civil disputes relating to Sri Vidya Kamachi Educational Trust and not to take any coercive action against the petitioners based on the complaint given by the fourth respondent. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.363 of 2026 For Petitioners : Mr.M.Fazil Perarivalan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 to R3 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) High Court of Madras R4 – Notice Served – No Appearance O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere in the civil disputes relating to Sri Vidya Kamachi Educational Trust and not to take any coercive action against the petitioners based on the complaint given by the fourth respondent. 2.It is seen that there is civil dispute pending between the petitioners and the fourth respondent. On the complaint lodged by the fourth respondent, respondents 1 to 3 are interfering with the civil dispute pending between them. 3.In view of the above, respondents 1 to 3 are directed not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and the fourth respondent in respect of the subject property. However, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.363 of 2026 respondents 1 to 3 are at liberty to take appropriate action as against the petitioners and the fourth respondent, if they commit any offence. 4.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 20.07.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1 The Superintendent of Police Salem District. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Salem District. 3 The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Salem District. 4 The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.363 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. pri W.P. Crl. No.363 of 2026 20.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis