Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56638 (MAD)

MANI v. LOGANATHAN

CMP/17689/2024 · 2026-07-27

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-07-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CMP No. 17689 of 2024 in CRP SR No.102995 of 2024 1. Mani S/o. Palani Gounder, Dharmapuri Dist., Puthu Mariamman Koil Street, Palacode Tk., and 2 Others 2. Murugan S/o. Palani, Dharmapuri Town, Thirupathur New Road, Dharmapuri Tk and Dist. 3. Kavitha W/o.Saravanan, Mittathar Street, Pennagaram Tharappu. Pennagaram Tk., Dharmapuri Dist. Appellant(s) Vs 1. Loganathan S/o. Muthusamy, Akraharam Village, Pennagarm Tk., Dharmapuri Dist. 2.Lakshmi W/o. Loganathan, Akraharam Village, Pennagaram Tk., Dharmapuri Dist. 3.Assistant Inspector of Police Land Grabbing,Dharmapuri. 4.Inspector of Police Land Grabbing,Dharmapuri. 5.Deputy Superintendent of Police Land Grabbing,Dharmapuri. 6.Deputy Superintendent of Police Land Grabbing, Pennagaram. 7.Sivakumarasankari D/o.Loganathan, Akraharam Village, Pennagaram Tk., Dharmapuri Dist. Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis P.B.BALAJI.,J sr For Appellant(s): Srimathi V. For Respondent(s): No appearance For RR.1,2 and 7 Mrs.S.Yogalakshmi Government Counsel For RR.3 to 6 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. There is no representation on the side of the respondents 1,2 and 7 who have chosen to enter appearance through counsel. The remaining respondents have been served. Their names have also been printed in the cause list. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners taking me through the affidavit filed in support of the petition states that sufficient reasons have been assigned for not preferring the revision in time. She would further state that the delay is only 173 days and the same is neither inordinate nor deliberate. 3. I have carefully considered the submissions advanced from the side of the petitioners and also gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition. 4. I do not see any wilful or deliberate delay caused by the petitioners in preferring the revision. Accordingly, CMP No.17689 of 2024 is ordered and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to number the revision if it is otherwise in order and post the revision in the usual course. 27.07.2026 sr CMP No. 17689 of 2024 in CRP SR No.102995 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis