IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 124 CWP-6781-2026 Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 DINCO 4 WHEELS LLP ALIAS DINCO MOTORS ...Petitioner Vs. MANOJ KUMAR AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Vikash Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 22.01.2026 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Narnaul, District Mahendergarh (for short ‘District Commission’). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that District Commission has passed impugned order without jurisdiction. 3. On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner expressed his inability to controvert that impugned order is an appealable order, however, submits that question of jurisdiction is involved, thus, writ is maintainable. 4. Maintainability of writ petition is one aspect and entertainability in view of availability of alternative remedy is another aspect. The District Commission has awarded a sum of Rs.8,23,000/- in favour of respondent. Considering the amount involved and availability DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.10 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6781-2026 -2- of remedy of first appeal before State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and thereafter second appeal before National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, this Court does not deem it appropriate to invoke its writ jurisdiction. 5. Dismissed. 6. It is made clear that the dismissal of petition would not inhibit the petitioner from availing any other alternative remedy. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 10, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.10 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document