2026:HHC:1750 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10885 of 2025 Date of decision: 6.1 . 2026 Naresh Kumar Vij. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Others. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner. Mr.Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge It has been jointly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General that grievances of the petitioner stand redressed in view of subsequent developments and, therefore, nothing survives to be adjudicated in present petition. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 2026:HHC:1750 CWP No. 10885 of 2025 2. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of being infructuous, alongwith pending applications, if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Romesh Verma), Judge. 6th January, 2026 (Keshav)