1 2026:CGHC:12795 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7081 of 2021 1 - Smt. Shubhra Sharma W/o Shri Himanshu Sharma, Aged About 35 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School, Bhatapara Khamhariya, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Permanent R/o Gondpara Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner, Public Education, Directorate, Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, Public Education, Directorate, Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sweta Dixit, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sakri, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Arunabha Mitra, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Lagra, Block Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - Reena Sao, Lecturer, Higher Secondary School, Girhola, Block Dhamdha, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh NIRMALA RAO 2 7 - Deepti Shukla, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhothli, Block And Tahsil Dhamtari Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 8 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Through The Controller, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, North Block, Vyapam Bhawan, Atal Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/ State : Shri Soumya Sharma, P.L. For respective respondents : Shri A.N. Pandey, Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Sourabh Pandey, Advocate and Shri Prakshay Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17.03.2026 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 3. Consequently, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi