Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 566 (KAR)

M/S J AND J FABRICATORS, v. UNION BANK OF INDIA

WP/11267/2025 · 2026-02-24

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11460 WP No. 11267 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 11267 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. M/S J AND J FABRICATORS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR A K JAMES, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.17/1, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN SRINIVAGILU-EJIPURA MAIN ROAD VIVEKNAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 047 2. MR. A K JAMES, S/O. ANTONY MUTHU AGED 54 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.17/1, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN SRINIVAGILU-EJIPURA MAIN ROAD VIVEKNAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 047 3. MRS.ANJALI RANI W/O JAMES AGED 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.17/1, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN SRINIVAGILU-EJIPURA MAIN ROAD VIVEKNAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 047. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIJI MALAYIL., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11460 WP No. 11267 of 2025 AND: UNION BANK OF INDIA NO 212, LUCKY INN COTTONPET MAIN ROAD BANGALORE 560 053. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRABHU RAO C B., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (a) QUASH THE E-AUCTION NOTIFICATION DTD 18.03.2025 IN RESPECT OF ALL THE PIECE AND PARCEL OF THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE HOUSE PROPERTY BUILT ON THE SITE NO. 13 VP KHATA NO. 53 HOUSE LIST NO. 97, PID NO. 68-107-14-17 MUNICIPAL NO. 17 1ST CROSS SRINIVAGLU BANGALORE MEASURING EAST TO WEST 20 FEET NORTH TO SOUTH 30 FEET TOTALLY MEASURING 600SQ FT PUBLISHED IN E PAPER NEW INDIAN EXPRESS.COM WEBSITE ON 18.3.2025 VIDE ANNX- A ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT; (b) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 4.04.2025 VIDE ANNX-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ***** - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11460 WP No. 11267 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to passage of time, the petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to challenge the action of the respondent, if so aggrieved, before the appropriate forum. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5