Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 566 (CHH)

RAJESH SONI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/78/2023 · 2026-02-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6498-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 78 of 2023 1 - Rajesh Soni S/o Shri Janki Lal Soni Aged About 52 Years R/o Manav Mandir Chowk, Ward No. 34, Police Thana Kotwali, Tehsil And District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Kotwali, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Asha Agrawal W/o Ritesh Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Baldev Bagh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Rashul Bhawnani, Advocate. For State : Shri Soumya Rai, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 05.02.2026 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 1 The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayer: “I. set aside/quash the impugned revision order dated 26.09.2022 passed by learned 1 Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon, in Criminal revision no. 43/2022. (ANNEXURE P/1) II. set aside/quash the impugned order dated 08.07.2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rajnandgaon in Criminal Case no. 25/2021, wherein charges has been framed against the petitioner under Section 409 and 420 of IPC (ANNEXURE P/2) and further be pleased to quash the formal INDRAJEET SAHU Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2026.02.05 16:56:23 +0530 2 Charge sheet dated 08.07.2022 framed against the petitioner. (ANNEXURE P/6). III. This Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings arising out of Criminal Case no. 25/2021, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rajnandgaon and further be pleased to quash the entire charge sheet and the F.I.R. bearing Crime no. 560/2020 lodged against the petitioner under Section 409 and 420 of IPC. IV. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass such other orders as this Hon’ble court may deem fit in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice.” 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition as trial is at the verge of its conclusion. 3 Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No order asto costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder