17-WP-10397-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10397 OF 2026 Amadi Abdurab Mulla ..Petitioner Versus Maniram Ramkishore Varma and Ors …Respondents Mr. Sachin R Pawar, for the Petitioner. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 29th AUGUST 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to a judgment and order dated 5th August 2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Mangaon, Raigad, whereby the Appeal preferred against an order passed by the Trial Court declining to grant status-quo during the pendency of the suit, came to be dismissed. 3. Having regard to the nature of the order and especially the time lag since the institution of the suit, this Court does not find any propriety in entertaining the Petition in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. ARS 1/2 ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2026.09.02 10:16:06 +0530 17-WP-10397-2026.DOC 4. However, since a grievance is made on behalf of the Petitioner that, the Application for temporary injunction filed by the Petitioner- Plaintiff awaits adjudication, the Petition stands disposed with a request to the Civil Judge to hear and decide the Application for temporary injunction filed on behalf of the Petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, and, preferably within a period of four months from the communication of this order. 5. Petition disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS 2/2