Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5658 (ALL)

JITENDRA PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/20558/2026 · 2026-09-07

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20558 of 2026 Court No. - 44 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Upon being informed that the charge sheet in the case has been submitted, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed, leaving it open to avail such remedy as might be available under the law. 2. Learned AGA has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition. 3. Under such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed and liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue such remedy as might be available to him. September 8, 2026 S.K.S. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Kumar Rai, Girish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Jitendra Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad