Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5657 (PNJ)

DEEPAK ALIAS DEEPU PANDIT v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/64772/2025 · 2026-01-16

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 212 Deepak @ Deepu State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDW The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 365 (Sections Section 365 was City Rewari, District 2. After appearing on behalf the present petition has already undergone months, the Trial prosecution evidence 3. I find 4. Hence, this stage, the Trial conclusion of the 5. In view pressed. 6. Pending 16.01.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64772 Date of decision: Deepu Pandit VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Ankur Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Sr. DAG, Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate for ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.324 dated 12.08.2022 (Sections 302, 379-B, 365, 120-B was deleted) of the Indian Penal Code, District Rewari. After arguing the matter at some behalf of the petitioner submits that petition at this stage, however, he prays undergone a substantive custody of Trial Court may be requested to evidence. find the aforesaid prayer to be reasonable. Hence, while disposing of the present Trial Court is requested to take all the prosecution witnesses. view of the above, the present petition Pending application(s), if any, shall (VINOD speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 64772-2025(O&M) decision: 16.01.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Haryana. for the complainant. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 12.08.2022 registered under B and 201 added later on and Code, 1860 at Police Station some length, learned counsel that he does not want to press prays that since the petitioner of more than 03 years and 05 expedite conclusion of the reasonable. present petition as not pressed at all measures for an expeditious petition is disposed of as not shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.01.16 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document