( 2026:JHHC:10023 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2477 of 2026 ------ 1. Shivam Sharma @ Shivam @ Shivam Shrama, aged about 24 years, son of Ram Nath Sharma, resident of Bhati Nagar, Chuna Baba, P.O.+P.S. –Burmamines, District –East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur) 2. Rahul Kumar, aged about 26 years, son of Jagdish Prasad, resident of Railway Traffic Colony, Near Pani Tanki, P.O.+P.S. –Bagbera, District –East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur). … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.147 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 109(1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant. It is then submitted that the quarrel is between the informant and his wife and allegedly at the behest of the wife of the informant, the petitioners fired upon the informant but the bullet missed the target. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. It is next submitted that without holding any Test Identification Parade, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 03.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 8 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.147 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08.04.2026 Sonu/