IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7943 of 2018 ========================================= ALIMAHMED ABDULKARIM PATNI & ORS. Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================= Appearance : MR ATIT D THAKORE for the Petitioners. LAW OFFICER BRANCH for the Respondent No.2. MR CHINTAN N DESAI for the Respondent No.2. MS DEVANSHI PATEL, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1,3 ========================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI Date : 11/02/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :- “[A] This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction, quashing and setting aside impugned orders dated 27.1.2016 and 30.1.2016 passed by the Ld. District Judge, Junagadh – respondent No.2, - Annexure – A, and be pleased to direct the respondents to grant 1st higher grade pay scale in the cadre of the BailiD to the petitioners from the date of completion of 9 years of service and to reEx and revise pension of the petitioners and to grant all consequential beneEts to them, [B] Pending the hearing and Enal disposal of the p. 2 petition, be pleased to direct the respondents to initiate the proceedings for grant 1st higher grade pay scale in the cadre of the BailiD to the petitioners from the date of completion of 9 years of service and to reEx and revise pension of the petitioners and to grant all consequential beneEts to them,” 2. At the outset, learned advocate Mr. Atit D. Thakore appearing for the petitioners states that the petitioners instead of pursuing this petition wants to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.2 as according to the petitioners, in respect of identically situated persons, beneEt as prayed for by them have already been granted by respondent No.2. 3. Learned AGP Ms. Devanshi Patel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and learned advocate Mr. Chintan Desai appearing for respondent No.2 could not object to the aforesaid request made by learned advocate Mr. Thakore. 4. Accordingly, if the petitioners make any representation to the respondent No.2 along with details of the beneEts given to the identically situated persons which are prayed for in this petition, the concerned respondents are directed to consider the representation that the petitioners may make and decide the same in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. If the respondents arrive at a conclusion that the petitioners are also required to be granted beneEts as prayed for, the same shall be granted to the petitioners within a period of three p. 3 months from the date of order that may be passed on the representation of the petitioners. In the event, if the respondents reject the representation, such order of rejection must be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation by passing a reasoned order and copy thereof may be served to each of the petitioners by Speed Post. 5. In view of the above direction, keeping all the rights and contentions of the petitioner open, learned advocate Mr. Atit Thakore seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Permission as prayed for is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged. It is clariEed that this Court has not examined the merits of the case. Direct service is permitted. (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) SAVARIYA