Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5656 (CAL)

SANNYASHI DHIBAR @ SANYASI DHIBAR AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/642/2026 · 2026-03-12

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12.03.2026 Court No.28 Item No.31 ssi CRM (A) 642 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Labpur Police Station Case No.229 of 2025 dated 30.10.2025 under Sections 85/103 of the BNS 2023 read with Section 4 of the DP Act. And In the matter of: Sannyashi Dhibar @ Sanyasi Dhibar & another. …. Petitioners Ms. Ipsita Ghosh …for the petitioners Ms. Sonali Das Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioners are the parents in law of the alleged victim. The incident took place about 11 years after marriage. The husband was arrested and is still in custody. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She refers to the post mortem report, the inquest report and the statements of witnesses including those of neighbours. Charge sheet has been submitted. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that the husband has already been arrested and is still in custody and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the 2 Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioners shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from this date and shall attend the jurisdictional Court regularly. The petitioners shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)