WP Crl. No. 264 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 264 of 2026 R.Udayakumar S/o. T.K.Ramachandran, Residing at No.10/2, Pushpanagar Main Road, Nungmbakkam, Chennai - 600 034. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sate of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home Through Principal Secretary, Secretariat Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 001. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Karappakam, Elcot Sez, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119. 3. Inspector of Police, T5, Kundrathur Police Station, Kundrathur, Kancheepuram - 600 069. 4. Transstroy (India) Limited Rep.by its Director, 5-91-25 4th Line Lakshmipuram Lakshmipuram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh - 522 007. 5. BBCL Prime Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its, Director, New No.20, Old No.23/2, Mylai Ranganathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 264 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus or any other writ or order in the nature of a writ, by forbearing the Respondents 2 and 3 from entering into or interfering with the possession of the petitioner in the property morefully described in the Schedule to the Writ Petition in any manner whatsoever and pass such other suitable order or orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr. B.Arvind Srevatsa For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh kumar Counsel for Government for R1 to R3 Mr.H.Adaikala Arockiaraj for R4 & R5 ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to Respondents 2 and 3 to restrain them from entering into or interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property measuring an extent of 90 cents and 61 cents, totaling 1 acre and 51 cents, in S.No. 25/3A and 25/3B in Tharapakkam Village. 2. While matters stood thus, on a vexatious complaint lodged by the private respondents, the 3rd respondent entered with force, trespassed into the petitioner’s property, and demolished the petitioner's compound wall. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 264 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3. The learned counsel for Respondents 4 and 5 submitted that, based on the alleged complaint, the petitioner had encroached upon a portion of their land and erected a compound wall. Upon receipt of the complaint from respondents 4 and 5, the 3rd respondent demolished the compound wall. In this regard, a civil suit has already been filed by the petitioner in O.S. No. 22 of 2026 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur. 4. In view of the above, the 3rd respondent is directed not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and Respondents 4 and 5. If any cognizable offense is made out, the 3rd respondent is directed to take appropriate action against Respondents 4 and 5 in accordance with the law. 5. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 20-07-2026 SMA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 264 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA To 1. The Sate of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home Through Principal Secretary, Secretariat Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 001. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Karappakam, Elcot Sez, Sholinganallur, Chennai - 600 119. 3. Inspector of Police, T5, Kundrathur Police Station, Kundrathur, Kancheepuram - 600 069. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court WP Crl. No. 264 of 2026 20-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis