Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56552 (MAD)

M.MOHAN v. The Commissioner of Police,

WP Crl./338/2026 · 2026-07-20

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. Crl. No.338 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. Crl. No.338 of 2026 M.Mohan ... Petitioner Vs. 1 The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram City Police, Sholinganallur, Chennai. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Manimangalam Range, Manimangalam, Chennai – 601 301. 3 The Inspector of Police, T-10, Manimangalam Police Station, Manimangalam, Chennai – 601 301. 4 The Inspector of Police (Crime), T-10, Manimangalam Police Station, Manimangalam, Chennai – 601 301. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the second respondent to transfer the petitioner’s complaint dated 21.11.2025 from the third respondent 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.338 of 2026 to the fourth respondent based on his petition dated 27.11.2025 forwarded by the first respondent in RC.No.03661/038634/COP-PG- TCP/2025 dated 28.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 to R4 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) High Court of Madras O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the second respondent to transfer the petitioner’s complaint dated 21.11.2025 from the third respondent to the fourth respondent based on his petition dated 27.11.2025 forwarded by the first respondent in RC.No.03661/038634/COP-PG-TCP/2025 dated 28.11.2025. 2.On receipt of the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the third respondent conducted enquiry and the same was closed. Therefore, transfer of investigation does not arise. That apart, investigation would arise only after registration of FIR. So far as the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the third respondent conducted enquiry and closed the same. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.338 of 2026 3.In view of the above, the direction sought for in this writ petition cannot be considered. The writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge private complaint in accordance with law, if so advised. 20.07.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Tambaram City Police, Sholinganallur, Chennai. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Manimangalam Range, Manimangalam, Chennai – 601 301. 3 The Inspector of Police, T-10, Manimangalam Police Station, Manimangalam, Chennai – 601 301. 4 The Inspector of Police (Crime), T-10, Manimangalam Police Station, Manimangalam, Chennai – 601 301. 5 The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.338 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. pri W.P. Crl. No.338 of 2026 20.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis