[2026:RJ-JP:15533] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2717/2026 Varun S/o Duryodhan, R/o Udiya Basti Ajay Aahuza Nagar Police Thana Anantpura Kota City Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3178/2026 Manish Das S/o Naresh Das, R/o Ajay Ahuja Nagar P.S. Anantpura, Kota. (At Present Confined In District Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 15/04/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 526/2025 registered at Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2),126(2), 109(1), and 189(2) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2) 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 191(2),(3) and 190 of BNS. [2026:RJ-JP:15533] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2717/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed; He further submits that petitioners are behind the bars since long; injury sustained by the injured is attributed to co-accused Anil Chanti with a sharp weapon; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there is one criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioner Varun under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 143 IPC. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already filed; petitioners are behind the bars since long; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Varun S/o Duryodhan and Manish Das S/o Naresh Das are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:15533] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2717/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J EKTA/27-28