Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56536 (MAD)

N.RAJENDRAN v. Commissioner of Police,

WP Crl./348/2026 · 2026-07-20

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 And W.P.M.P. Crl. Nos.102, 103, 104 and 105 of 2026 N.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1 Commissioner of Police, Salem City, 2-May, Sankari Main Road, Salem-636 006. 2 Inspector of Police, Kannankurichi Police Station, Salem District. 3 Devi Constructions, Rep.by its Proprietor cum Promotor, Builder, Developer, Land Title Holders, Thiru.P.Jayapal 4 Kanaka 5 J.PremChander 6 P.Komala Priya 7 J.Mohan Kumar 8 Kannammal Kandasamy 9 Narmatha Karthikeyan 10 T.Usha 11 S.Rahul 12 G.Narasimhan 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 13 Chairman-TNRERA No.1A, 1st Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 14 District Registrar, Room No.313, Salem Collectorate, Salem-636 001. 15 Daevi Hill View Apartment Owners Association, Represented by President, C.Bindu Unit A3, Deavi Hill View Apartment, Kurumbapatti Road, Gorimedu, Salem – 636 008. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 and 2 respondents to initiate appropriate legal and disciplinary action against the respondents 3 to 11. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ezhilraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1, R2 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) High Court of Madras Mr.R.Babu for R3 Mr.B.Kumarasamy for R4, R5, R6, R8, R9 Mr.B.Vijayakumar for R12 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the 1 and 2 respondents to initiate appropriate legal and disciplinary action against the respondents 3 to 11. 2.It is seen that there is civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents 3 to 15 herein in respect of apartment amenities and other issues. Therefore, the petitioner ought to have approached the civil Court for appropriate relief. 3.Hence the complaint lodged by the petitioner cannot be considered. The writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 20.07.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 To 1 Commissioner of Police, Salem City, 2-May, Sankari Main Road, Salem-636 006. 2 Inspector of Police, Kannankurichi Police Station, Salem District. 3 Chairman-TNRERA No.1A, 1st Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 4 District Registrar, Room No.313, Salem Collectorate, Salem-636 001. 5 The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. pri W.P. Crl. No.348 of 2026 And W.P.M.P. Crl. Nos.102, 103, 104 and 105 of 2026 20.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis