Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5653 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, v. SHREEDHAR S R ,

MFA/100856/2016 · 2026-02-16

K Manmadha Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2332 MFA No. 100856 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100856 OF 2016 (MV-I) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.W.K.S.R.T.C., SIRSI, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI. …APPELLANT (BY SMT.P.R.BENTUR, ADVOCATE) AND: SHREEDHAR S.R., AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, R/O: POLICE QUARTERS, SIRSI, TQ: SIRSI. …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE M.V. ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T., SIRSI DATED 22.07.2015 IN MVC NO.209/2014 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.07.2015 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2332 MFA No. 100856 of 2016 ORAL ORDER None appears for the appellant. 2. At the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, this court vide order dated 05.02.2026 granted one week time to take steps for service of notice on the sole respondent. 3. Today, there is no representation for the appellant and till date steps are not taken for service of notice on the sole respondent. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE MBS, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 58