HARISH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/442/2026 · 2026-01-07
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5652 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5652 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 370/2026 a/w connected matters
Decided on: 07.01.2026
1.
CWP No. 370/2026
Asha Devi & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents.
2.
CWP No. 442/2026
Harish Kumar & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
.…Respondents.
3.
CWP No. 550/2026
Vishal Sharma & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate in
all the matters.
For the respondent(s): Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General in all the
matters. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in all the matters.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
2.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are
directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Mohit Sharma2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 7th January, 2026(rohit)
2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024