[2026:RJ-JP:12661] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 842/2026 Deenbandhu S/o Kalyan Sahay, R/o Beench Ka Kunwa, Roopbas, Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP with Mr. Rameshwar Lal, SHO, PS Aravali Vihar, Alwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 25/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused- applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.391/2025 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 & Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 112(2) of the BNS, 2023 & Section 66 of the IT Act, 2000 dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused submits that the applicant is behind bars since 18.09.2025. It is submitted that the applicant is the sole bread earner of his family and that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter. It is next [2026:RJ-JP:12661] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-842/2026] submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed and that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till the disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Investigating Officer upon marking presence in the Court, has submitted that the present matter pertains to a cartel to the tune of approximately Rs. 2.5 Crores, which can be siphoned by the accused along with the other co-accused and extended family members, using various accounts. It is apprised to the Court that as on date, a number of persons involved are absconding. 5. Heard and considered. 6. Upon doing the needful it is noted that the matter pertains to siphoning of approximately Rs. 2.5 Crores, wherein provisions enshrined under the IT Act are involved and the same shall also have an impact upon general public, therefore, keeping in mind the welfare of State and general public, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J RINCHU /84