Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5645 (CAL)

SUNIL MANDI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/29879/2025 · 2026-02-12

Kausik Chanda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12.02.2026 Item No.06. Ct. No.15 Suman WPA 29879 of 2025 Sunil Mandi -Vs- The State of West Bengal and Ors. Mr. Keshab Chandra Das Ms. Aparajita Mondal ..for the petitioner Mr. Pradip Saren Mr. Soumik Ghosh Ms. Saheli Hembrom ..for respondent no.11. Ms. Rama Halder Ms. Ananya Neogi ..for the State There is no merit in the allegations advanced by the writ petitioner that respondent no.11 has constructed his residential building without obtaining a sanctioned plan from the Panchayat Authority. Respondent No. 11 has produced a permission letter purportedly issued by the Panchayat. A copy of the permission letter shall be retained on record. The report filed on behalf of the State shall also be taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, however, submits that the land on which the building has been constructed is “Barga” land. This Court is of the view that, within the scope of the present writ petition, it is not 2 appropriate to adjudicate upon the right, title, and interest of the respective parties over the land in question. Accordingly, WPA 29879 of 2025 stands dismissed. The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)