Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5644 (UTT)

SACHIN SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/150/2026 · 2026-05-18

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:3814 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA No. 150 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Karan Singh Dugtal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned AGA for the State. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail on the basis of a newspaper extract which was published on 01.05.2026. 4. Mr. Tumul Nainwal apprise to this Court that already two FIRs have been registered against the present applicant and furthermore he has not fulfilled the undertaking as given before the Coordinate Bench that after being released on bail he will certainly return the amount to the complainant. 5. Be that as it may, based on a newspaper extract the anticipatory bail cannot be granted particularly when already two FIRs have been registered against the present applicant. 6. In such view of the matter, I do find any merit in the instant anticipatory bail application and the same is dismissed accordingly. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 18.05.2026 Nahid 2026:UHC:3814