ISHTIYAK AHMAD v. UTTAR PRADESH RAJYA DWARA PRADHAN SACHIV URJA AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/35778/2026 · 2026-09-08
Indrajeet Shukla, Prakash Padia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5642 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5642 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35778 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. Sri Chetan Chaterjee, learned counsel for the respondent No.3/Electricity Department placed before this Court final assessment order dated 18.03.2026, copy of the same is taken on record and a copy of the aforesaid order has also been provided to the petitioner.
2. After going through the same, a prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner to dismiss the present petition as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal as provided under Section 127 of the Electricity Act 2003 before appropriate forum.
3. This prayer has not been opposed by Sri Chetan Chaterjee, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. September 9, 2026 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chetan Chatterjee (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Ishtiyak Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Uttar Pradesh Rajya Dwara Pradhan Sachiv Urja And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad