Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56416 (MAD)

Sakthivel v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Kulithalai

CRL OP(MD)/15442/2026 · 2026-07-27

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15442 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.07.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 15442 of 2026 Sakthivel ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kulithalai Police Station, Karur District. (Crime No.309 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vishnu Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 309 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Section 275, 123 of BNS and Section 24(1) of COTP Act, 2003, in Crime No.309 of 2026 on the 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15442 of 2026 file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.07.2026, on personal information, the respondent police went to the scene of occurrence near a poromboke land at Ayyarmalai and found that the accused in illegal possession of 52 kgs. 80 grams of banned tobacco products. Hence, the case was registered and the petitioner was arrested. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 28.06.2026 and ready to abide any condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner. 4.The learned Counsel for the State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has no previous case. The investigation in this case is still pending. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15442 of 2026 record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation against the petitioner, that the petitioner has no previous case, considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai, Karur District, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of six weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15442 of 2026 inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (K R S J) 27.07.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai, Karur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kulithalai Police Station, Karur District. (Crime No.309 of 2026) 3.The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Kulithalai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15442 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 15442 of 2026 Date : 27.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis