IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.127 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Sakshi Suman, d/o Mahesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Shiv Kumari Pahad, Ward no 16, PS Kahalgoan, District Bhagalpur. 2. Sanvi Priya, D/o Ranveer Kumar, Resident of Village Shiv Kumari Pahad, Ward no 16, PS Kahalgoan, District Bhagalpur. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Ranveer Kumar, Son of Narad Prasad Mandal, Resident of Vill Shiv Kumari Pahad, Ward no 16, PS Kahalgoan, Distt Bhagalpur. 2. Air HQ (VB) Rafi Marg, New Delhi 110106 through Union of India. 3. AFCAO (S Accts O) Subroto Prak, New Delhi, Pin 110010 through Union of India. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, Advcoate For the UOI : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ) 2 19-03-2026 1. The instant Miscellaneous Application under Section 19(1) of the Family Court’s Act 1984 has been preferred by the appellants (wife and daughter of respondent no. 1) against the order dated 02.05.2025 seeking enhancement of maintenance amount granted by the Principal Judge, Family Court while allowing their application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. 2. On the matter being taken up, at the outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Dilip Kumar Sharma @ Dilip Sharma Patna High Court MA No.127 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors. [2024 SCC OnLine Pat 8236 : 2025 (1) BLJ 1] has held that the order passed under Section 125 of the Cr. P.C. is not an ‘interlocutory order’, but an ‘intermediate / quasi final order’, hence remedy of criminal revision would be available qua both the interim and final order under Section 125 to 128 of the Cr. P.C. 3. He further submits that in the light of the aforesaid Full Bench judgment, the appellants do not want to press this Miscellaneous Appeal, therefore, they may be allowed to withdraw this Miscellaneous Appeal with liberty to file criminal revision against the order dated 02.05.2025. 4. In view of the above, the instant Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellants to file criminal revision. 5. Office is directed to return the Vakalatnama and certified copy of impugned order dated 02.05.2025 to the learned counsel for the appellants within three days after retaining the xerox copy of the same on record. manoj/aditya- (Sanjay Kumar Singh , J) (Sourendra Pandey, J) U