Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5641 (KAR)

DEEPAK S/O MALLU KANKONKAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/100366/2025 · 2026-02-06

B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1725-DB CCC No. 100366 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100366 OF 2025 BETWEEN: DEEPAK S/O MALLU KANKONKAR, AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. HP NO.17, RAMNAGAR, TAL. JOIDA, DIST. KARWAR(U.K.) … COMPLAINANT (BY SRI ABHIJEET S. KANKONKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI P. SUNIL KUMAR, DEPT. OF REVENUE, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, R/O. C/O VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SMT. LAKSHMI PRIYA K., DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DIST. KARWAR (U.K.)-581 186. 3. AMRISH RATHOD, PDO GRAM PANCHAYATH RAMNAGAR, TAL. JOIDA, DIST. UTTAR KANNADA-581 453. … ACCUSED (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO ISSUE SUMMONS, TO THE ACCUSED AND TO DEAL WITH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1725-DB CCC No. 100366 of 2025 FOR WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P. NO.100411/2025 (LB-RES), DATED 28/02/2025; DIRECT, THE ACCUSED NO.1 TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P. NO.100411/2025 (LB- RES) DATED 28/02/2025 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) The contempt petition is filed on the ground that, there is a violation of the order passed in W.P.No.100411/2025. 2. The learned AGA submits that, subsequent to the order passed in W.P.No.100411/2025, the State preferred an application in the said writ petition and further time till 03.08.2026 is granted to do the needful in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.100411/2025. 3. On the said ground it is submitted that, there is no contempt of the order passed in W.P.No.100411/2025. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1725-DB CCC No. 100366 of 2025 4. For the aforementioned reason, the contempt petition is hereby dismissed as being premature. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE SSP CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 3