2026:UHC:3607 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/ 1 4 6 / 2 0 2 6 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ketan Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Present applicant Abhimanyu, S/o Anil Kumar is praying for anticipatory bail in reference to FIR dated 08.04.2026, bearing FIR No. 0110 of 2026, registered at P.S. Gadarpur District U.S.Nagar wherein he along with five other were implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 127, 316(2), 318(4), 47 and 49 of BNS 2023. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and there is delay in reporting and there is no recovery from the applicant and no custodial interrogation of the applicant is required and prima facie allegations alleged in the FIR does not constitute an offence. He further submits that there is great apprehension of arrest and the learned Sessions Judge in a casual manner rejected his anticipatory bail application. He further submits that the applicant is ready to cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the I.O. 6. On the previous date the State counsel was directed to get instructions and today on instructions Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder apprise to this Court that applicant appeared before the I.O. and I.O. interrogate him and sufficient material and information he has gathered and the applicant is having direct role in the offence as alleged and the matter is 2026:UHC:3607 under investigation, therefore, the applicant does not deserve for anticipatory bail. 7. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and after gone through with the FIR and the instructions as received by the learned State Counsel and further taking into consideration that the investigation is still going on, I do not find any good ground to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 12.05.2026 Parul