Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5638 (RAJ)

JAIPAL @ J.P. S/O KHEMARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5326/2026 · 2026-04-10

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15143] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 5326/2026 Jaipal @ J.P. S/o Khemaram, R/o Shilgaon, Police Station And Tehsil Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 164/2015 registered at Police Station Mundawar District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 323, 341, 302 IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant was granted benefit of bail on 31.10.2018, subject to certain conditions. It is submitted that applicant's bail application was canceled vide order dated 14.10.2025, by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, on account of flouting the conditions of the bail as granted. Thereafter, the applicant surrendered and from preceding six months, he is in custody. [2026:RJ-JP:15143] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5326/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused- applicant has already been granted benefit of bail vide order dated 31.10.2018; that thereafter bail was canceled on 14.10.2025 on account of flouting of the conditions of the bail; that accused- applicant has surrendered and accused-applicant is in custody for last six months; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Jaipal @ J.P. S/o Khemaram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /233