Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56361 (MAD)

Haritha @ Kondoor Haritha v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Singampunari

CRL OP(MD)/7609/2026 · 2026-07-15

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7609 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.8203 & 8206 of 2026 1. Haritha @ Kondoor Haritha 2. G.Raja 3. Nagamanikkam 4. Karthikeyan ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1,2,4 & 6 Vs 1. State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Singampunari Police Station, Sivagangai District, Crime No.29/2025 2. Sachin ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records relating to the impugned criminal proceedings in CC.No. 143/2025, on the file of the learned District cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, and quash the same as illegal as against the petitioners are concerned. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis . For Petitioners : M/s.G.Aravinthan for M/s.Aran Legal Consultancy For Respondents : M/s.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(crl.side) for R1 M/s.S.Vijayakumar for R2 ***** ORDER The present petition has been filed by A1, A2, A4 and A6 in C.C.No.143 of 2025, on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 191(2), 329(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 133, 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. 2. Pending trial, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. 3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person before this Court and he submits that the charge sheet as against all the accused persons may be quashed even though A3 and A5 have not filed a quash petition. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4. Considering the above said facts, charge sheet in C.C.No.143 of 2025, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari, stands quashed as against all the accused persons. Accordingly, this Criminal original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 15.07.2026 2/2 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR To 1.The learned District cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari. 2. The Inspector of Police, Singampunari Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J. RJR Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7609 of 2026 15.07.2026 2/2 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis