Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5634 (UTT)

TRILOK SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1406/2026 · 2026-05-19

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:3864 SL. No . Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS/ 1 4 0 6 / 2 0 2 6 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Petitioner is challenging the order dated 16.03.2026 passed by respondent no. 2/ District Magistrate, Haridwar in Case No. 24/ 2025, whereby his arms licence was cancelled. 4. Learned State Counsel points out that Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 provides for an appeal, therefore, writ petition would not be maintainable. 5. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said contention. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the appellate forum. If he files an appeal within ten days from today, the same shall be decided on merits, ignoring the question of limitation. ( Manoj Kum ar Tiw ar i, J.) 19.05.2026 AK 2026:UHC:3864