2026:HHC:397 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 7130 of 2025 Decided on : 02.01.2026 Yogesh Dahiya …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Seema Kaushal Guleria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shivpal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 5. Ms. Rita Goswami, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Komal Chaudhary, for respondents No.6 & 7. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has , inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “(i) That the impugned Leave certificate on the basis of which the respondents are bent upon to issue transfer certificate, both the said certificates one of which is 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:397 contained in Annexure P-5 on the basis of unilateral inquiry alongwith unilateral and illegal inquiry may kindly be quashed and set aside by issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be passed against the respondents and in favour of the petitioner. (ii) That the respondents may very kindly be directed to permit the petitioner to continue with School i.e. Rashtriya Military School Chail, District Solan, H.P. and permitted to complete his 10+2 by issuing a writ of mandamus.” 2. In light of the fact that now the petitioner has been handed over a Transfer Certificate by the respondent-school, the Court is not dwelling on the merit of the case and as prayed for, this petition is closed with the observation that as now the petitioner intends to get himself enrolled in a school at Sonipat in Haryana, after the petitioner gets himself enrolled as such and in case he thereafter approaches or the school approaches the Central Board of School Education for the purpose of the registration of the petitioner as a student of class 10+1 and 10+2, then taking into consideration the facts as to why the petitioner could not be earlier registered with the school or CBSE, this Court hopes and expects that sympathetic view will 3 2026:HHC:397 be taken by the Central Board of School Education, so that academic year(s) of the petitioner is not wasted. 3. 3. In light of the fact that learned Senior Counsel for Central Board of School Education has apprised this Court that the last date for registration as a 10+1 and 10+2 student is over, the Central Board of School Education may explore the possibility of registering the petitioner by levying some late fees. 4. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 02, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)