Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5627 (RAJ)

RANDHIR SINGH S/O LT. SHRI BHURA RAM v. GOKUL SINGH S/O LT. SHRI BHURA RAM

CW/20728/2025 · 2026-04-17

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16229] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20728/2025 Randhir Singh S/o Lt. Shri Bhura Ram, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Samaspur, Tehsil And District, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1 Gokul Singh S/o Lt. Shri Bhura Ram, Aged About 78 Years, Resident Of Samaspur, Tehsil And District, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 2 Praveen Alias Dinesh S/o Shri Randhir Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Samaspur, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 3 Bajranglal S/o Late Bhuraram, (Died During The Pendency Of Suit) 3.1 Jagdish S/o Lt. Bajranglal, Aged About 48 Years, (Died During The Pendency Of Suit) 3.1.1 Smt. Indira, Aged About 58 Years, W/o Late Jagdish 3.1.2 Narendra, Aged About 36 Years, S/o Late Jagdish 3.1.3 Sandeep S/o Late Jagdish, Aged About 33 Years, All Are R/o Samaspur, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 3.2 Smt. Bhateri Devi Alias Prabhati Devi W/o Jaipal, Daughter Of Late Bajranglal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Chauradi, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu 3.3 Smt. Sushila Devi W/o Surendra Daughter Of Late Bajranglal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Chauradi, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu 4 Sagar S/o Late Bhuraram, Aged About 67 Years, (Proceedings Abated) 5 Rameshwar Singh S/o Late Bhuraram, Aged About 65 Years, (Proceedings Abated) Both Are R/o Samaspur, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhusudan Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA [2026:RJ-JP:16229] (2 of 2) [CW-20728/2025] Judgment / Order 17/04/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present civil writ petition if a direction is issued to the learned Trial Court to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible within a fixed time frame. 2. Accordingly, the present civil writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 3. However, the learned First Appellate Court is directed to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary adjournments. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/21