SHARDA DEVI WIFE OF SHRI RAJU BUNKAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/451/2025 · 2026-03-05
Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5626 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5626 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9498-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 451/2025 Sharda Devi Wife Of Shri Raju Bunkar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Badnagar, Khatela Ki Dhani, P.s. Pragpura, District Kotputali Behror At Present R/o Oakwood Moladiya Ke Pichhe, Neemrana, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur.
2. Superintendent Of Police, Kotputali Behror.
3. Station House Officer, P.s. Neemrana, District Kotputali Behror.
4. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur. Respondents
5. Lal Chand Gurjar, Son Of Kailash Gurjar
6. Vijay Gurjar, Son Of Shri Kailash Gurjar
7. Vijay Gurjar Son Of Unknown, 5 To 7 R/o Udanwas, Post Bardot P.s. Neemrana District Kotputali Behror. ----Accused/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Ms. Neha Goyal Ms. Charul Gupta (RPS), CO, Neemrana, District Kotputali-Behror HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Judgment / Order 05/03/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:9498-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-451/2025] Pursuant to order of this Court dated 23.02.2026, the missing girl Ms. “P” is produced before us by Ms. Charul Gupta (RPS), C.O., Neemrana, District Kotputali-Behror. Indisputably, she is minor. On interaction, she stated that she wants to go to Balika Grah and not to her parental home. In view thereof, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of in following terms:- (1) The Police authorities are directed to keep Ms. “P” in Lado Pariya Balika Grah Anath Ashram, 91-B, Taruchhaya Nagar, Taro Ki Koont, Tonk Road, Jaipur, 302029 and the State Authorities are directed to ensure her well-being till she attains the age of majority. (2) The parents are at liberty to meet her as per applicable rules and regulations. (3) It is clarified that if Ms. “P” wants to reside with her parents in future, she is at liberty to move an appropriate application in this regard before the competent forum. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-136