Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 562 (KAR)

M S YOGESH v. PRAKASH M S

WP/9489/2025 · 2026-02-21

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10820 WP No. 9489 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.9489 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M.S. YOGESH S/O. M.S. SIDDARAMU AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 2. M.S. DURGASHREE W/O DAYANANDA AND S/O M.S. SIDDARAMU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 3. R.K. HEMALATHA W/O M.S. SIDDARAMU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT MANGALA VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBALI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PRAKASH M.S. S/O LATE K. SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 2. KUMARASWAMY S/O LATE K. SIDDEGOWDA, UNMARRIED, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10820 WP No. 9489 of 2025 3. PAVITHRA W/O M.S. PRAKASHA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 4. PUTTAMMA W/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE ALL RESIDING AT MANGALA VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 478. 5. SHRINIVASAREDDY S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.45/1, MEENAKSHI LAYOUT, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA ELECTRONIC CITY POST, BANGALORE-560 100. 6. SADASHIVA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT RAYASANDRA VILLAGE, SARZAPURHOBLI, ANEKALLU TALUK, BANGALORE-560 099. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P. BHUVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R.1; R.2, R.3 AND R.4 ARE SERVED.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2024 MADE IN I.A.NO.2 IN R.A.NO.9/2021 PASSED BY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10820 WP No. 9489 of 2025 THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MANDYA VIDE ANNEXURE-H, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the petition. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. The petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20